![]() By that I mean the histogram reflected what I saw in camera - running nearly from edge to edge as I would expect. ![]() So I loaded some of these RAW files into RawTherapee, and its histogram showed images much closer to 'properly' exposed. But when I loaded it into Darktable - Histogram showed underexposed. For ETTR exposures, it was further to the right as expected. For 'normal exposure' - it was evenly spaced. Shooting manual, I was able to increased my exposures up to 1.5 stops just to see what I would get. Today I was playing around with some flower photos, testing the zebra settings (set at 95%) to see how far I could go before blowing highlights. Every subject, even though the Filmic module boosts exposure by 0.75 to mimic what we see with the in camera JPG images, if I go by the DT histogram, I need to boost my exposures bu up to 1.5 stops to fill up the histogram from end to end, or more depending on subject. I use DT in the Scene Referred mode, and when I load my images, the histogram always shows them as underexposed. I am not real conversant with post processing, but I eventually do get results I like. I use Darktable 3.4 as my primary RAW processor because I am a Linux user. I may need to post this in the Panny thread, but I'll start here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |